|
|
Posted by MassiveProng on 03/08/07 00:26
On Wed, 07 Mar 2007 20:07:23 GMT, "def456" <def456@none.none> Gave us:
>"Justin" <nospam@insightbb.com> wrote in message
>news:slrneuu6fp.as2.nospam@debian.dns2go.com...
>> def456 wrote on [Wed, 07 Mar 2007 19:10:45 GMT]:
>>>
>>>> You should just leave the original subject alone and print your comment.
>>>
>>> Wrong again. It is fine to change the subject, and it is not really
>>> necessary to include any of the original subject matter. In this branch
>>> of
>>
>> RFC 1855: Netiquette Guidelines
>> "If you are sending a reply to a message or a posting be sure you
>> summarize the original at the top of the message, or include just enough
>> text of the original to give a context. This will make sure readers
>> understand when they start to read your response. Since NetNews,
>> especially, is proliferated by distributing the postings from one host
>> to another, it is possible to see a response to a message before seeing
>> the original. Giving context helps everyone. But do not include the
>> entire original!"
>> http://www.dtcc.edu/cs/rfc1855.html#3
>
>That's just one opinion. I don't agree, nor am I looking for your approval
>either, so you don't need to continue to respond.
>
Everyone:
PLONK to the retard!
There was a day when this worked, and dipshits like this DefTard
dumbfuck would never see a single response from anyone after being
such a stupid, non-conformal fucktard.
So yeah, dumbfuck... keep it up. Good luck having a discourse with
anyone you fuck over due to your retarded, bull headed bullshit.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|