Posted by MassiveProng on 03/14/07 01:12

On Tue, 13 Mar 2007 18:02:23 GMT, AZ Nomad
<aznomad.2@PremoveOBthisOX.COM> Gave us:

>On Tue, 13 Mar 2007 07:16:23 -0700, Karl S <nospam@ak.net> wrote:
>
>
>>On Mon, 12 Mar 2007 18:49:28 -0700, MassiveProng wrote:
>
>>> On Mon, 12 Mar 2007 08:54:10 -0700, Karl S <nospam@ak.net> Gave us:
>>>
>>>>On 12 Mar 2007 04:04:39 -0700, jeffd1975@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> especially the ones where I
>>>>> copied from VHS to DVD.
>>>>
>>>>Because, in effect, you are watching a VHS recording which probably looked
>>>>bad on an SD TV twenty years ago.
>>>>
>>>>Normal DVDs look terrific on my 92 inch projection TV.
>>>
>>>
>>> Try it without an upconverting player.
>
>>They still look terrific. The projector does the upconverting.
>
>As does any tv that isn't defective. The only thing missing from having the
>tv upconvert as opposed to a separate box is that special feeling of pride
>that comes from spending too much.

Early TVs were very poor at it. Sluggish, and fast action scenes
showed many artifacts.

I still think DLP has issues with fast moving scenery, and I won't
buy into that realm until it improves drastically.

• Next in forum: Re: The Illusionist Vs. The Prestige
• Prev in forum: Re: Is DVD going to become obsolete because of HDTV ?
• Thread view: Re: Is DVD going to become obsolete because of HDTV ?

[Reply to this message]