|
|
Posted by David McCall on 03/20/07 15:35
"Maciej Szymanski" <ms@no.spam.here.asor.com.pl> wrote in message
news:eto8ob$88l$1@atlantis.news.tpi.pl...
> Richard Crowley wrote:
>> I think there are now a couple of generations that never heard
>> of "tube cameras" or horrors like hours sitting at the console
>> dialing in registrations and then trying to get the cameras to
>> look like they were in the same room. I needed a good laugh.
>> I wonder if "ushere" has ever seen decent video?
>
> Sorry for getting your bad memories out of the darkness... I think it's
> wrong place for my questions anyway. You are probably the kind of people
> who don't understand those who sail on wooden boats, or restore
> Supermarine Spitfire. Wooden boats are just good enough to make a fire and
> Spit is just a pile of aluminum scrap.
>
> Regards,
> Maciek
>
It isn't about wooden boats and spitfires.
Most people would not look for the crappiest boats to restore.
They would look for a boat that had some redeeming history or craftsmanship.
As far as I know that camera/deck has neither.
If you were restoring an RCA TK76, or an Ikegami HL-79 (especially if
the camera had been used to document something special) then it might make
some sense.
It's hard to understand why you would want to restore an old KY-1900.
They never were a camera that could make nice pictures, and as far as
we know the KY 1900 was never known to be special.
David
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|