|
Posted by Dave on 03/21/07 09:11
nappy wrote:
> "Kill Bill" <killbill@goblowme.com> wrote in message
> news:JXVLh.8636$yW.6588@newssvr11.news.prodigy.net...
>> nappy wrote:
>>> "Charlie S." <CharlieStam@verizon.net> wrote in message
>>> news:emILh.8913$dG.3854@trndny08...
>>>
>>>>> http://cgi.ebay.com/Macintosh-PowerMac-G4-Dual-1-25GHz_W0QQitemZ260096904544QQcategoryZ51035QQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem
>>>>>
>>>>> Here's a Mac G4 dual 1.25GH. This is a five year old computer! When
>>>>> I'm looking at the auction right now, it's going for near 800 dollars..
>>>>> Do you think that you would get 800 dollars for a 5 year old PC??
>>>
>>> Of course you could. A dual processor PC, like the one I am writing this
>>> on is worth more than $800. The idea that macs hold value is not based in
>>> reality.
>> It's not based on reality, It's based on Fact such as the link thats
>> provided, unlink any fact that you've provided.
>>
>> -bill
>
> blah.. posting an ebay link is not proof of anything. Go ahead an unlink my
> facts. See if I care ( tee hee)
>
> But since you asked.. here's a link to plenty of PCs that are old
>
> http://search.ebay.com/search/search.dll?cgiurl=http%3A%2F%2Fcgi.ebay.com%2Fws%2F&fkr=1&from=R8&satitle=DUal+Xeon&category0=&submitSearch=Search
>
> Doh!
That link is nothing but a bunch of 1 year old servers.. these are not
even related to desktop machines you would be using for editing.
Bill made a very good point. And everyone already knows that Macs hold
there value far better than PCs too.. So, we're not sure of what your
disputing.
-dave
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|