|
|
Posted by Richard C. on 03/26/07 00:56
Quit changing your name, darkmater, joeblow, massive prong!
That is the sign of a pathetic trolltard, dipshit!
============================
"JB" <jb@hifi.net> wrote in message
news:7m1d035lj3vfirh9hokn50p26q890istpk@4ax.com...
> On Sat, 24 Mar 2007 11:11:49 -0400, Kimba W Lion <KimbaWLion@> wrote:
>
>>Dont write <nospam@nomail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>Ok, I haven't been keeping up with technology, and I am just wondering
>>>about the basics of BluRay. I guess more particularly the diffenernce
>>>(advantages?) of BluRay, and DVD.
>>
>>Blu-Ray has a tiny catalog of mostly worthless titles.
>
> They're worthless to you because you can't afford them, dipshit
>
>>A Blu-Ray player will cost you at least 5 times more than a really good
>>DVD
>>player.
>
> Bullshit. You're pulling figures out of your ass.
>
>>Blu-Ray uses the same compression scheme as DVD, which is why they had to
>>go
>>to a high-capacity disc to provide HD.
>
> Crap. Are you retarted or what ?
>
> Blu-ray uses H.264 or VC-1 which are not DVD codecs.
>
>>Blu-Ray discs were originally planned to be supplied in a caddy, because
>>the
>>data layer is closer to the surface, and therefore surface damage is more
>>of
>>a problem. It remains to be seen if Blu-Ray discs can survive handling by
>>the average person.
>
> Well if a dipshit like you tosses them like frisbees then the
> reliability is shot.
>
>>With HD-DVD going head-to-head with Blu-Ray for the tiny percentage of the
>>consumer market that even knows either exists, Blu-Ray's future is
>>uncertain. (And Sony has a long history of maverick formats that never
>>caught on.) DVD is practically universally accepted.
>
> Uncertain ? What planet do you live on ?
>
> Blu-ray has the lions share of industry support. It's not going to
> disappear despite what FUD you believe.
>
> Keep talking crap, dipshit - you might get some reject to believe it.
>
>
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|