|
|
Posted by Exo on 03/27/07 21:57
Your all assuming on his assumption on assuming his assumption of
there assumptions that assume to be all of the ng assume the
assumption would love to assume his assumption is correct assumption
assuming there is not asuumption ahhhh I am confused... :P
On Tue, 27 Mar 2007 16:40:48 +0100, "Paul J Lawless"
<paul@gm4pgv.plus.com> wrote:
>
>"Khris" <khristopher*REMOVE*@gmail.com> wrote in message
>news:o7gem6nqgfzn$.1ac7cijwpxgng.dlg@40tude.net...
>> On Sun, 25 Mar 2007 20:07:25 +1100, Axel VK wrote:
>>
>>> "dezza" <prosonics@yahoo.com.au> wrote in message
>>> news:1174802333.361436.311050@y66g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
>>>> "Axel VK" wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> You're asking a question directed to the poster. So why did you post it
>>>>> to
>>>>> the whole group?????
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ^^^ Because the whole group may be interested.
>>>
>>> Thats an assumption on your part.
>>
>> And a pretty damn good assumption on his part!!
>>
>>
>>>
>>>> Should have been an email!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ^^^ Why didn't you e-mail me ????
>>>
>>> So other people know not to make the same mistake.
>>
>> So kinda like his assumption that the whole group would like to
>> know......right?
>>
>>
>Now now children!
>
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|