|
Posted by Charlie S. on 03/30/07 21:17
"ushere" <removethis.leslie.wand@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:mQHOh.3360$M.3257@news-server.bigpond.net.au...
> Charlie S. wrote:
>> Tried the camera out again tonight. I like it. The only problem I have
>> is the viewfinder. It's on the left side and doesn't tilt out like a
>> typical LCD display. Since I focus with my left eye, I can't look into
>> the viewfinder unless I am some distance away. Is there a work-around
>> for this type of problem?
>>
>>
>> "Charlie S." <CharlieStam@verizon.net> wrote in message
>> news:97kOh.3683$J21.2047@trndny03...
>>> I am fairly new to video. Been borrowing the local cable company's
>>> Canon GL2 most of the time. I also have a small Sony mini-dv handicam.
>>>
>>>
>>> Looking for feedback about this camera and your opinion as whether
>>> buying it might be a good decision to buy or not.
>>>
>>> This is the situation:
>>>
>>> Have an opportunity to buy a used JVC GY-DV500U, plus a used and heavy
>>> tripod that goes with it for around $!000. The manufacturing date is
>>> January 2000. From what I hear there was a recall issue on this date,
>>> but I imagine it's been resolved.
>>>
>>> The camera looks pretty beat up. The paint on the handle is worn away.
>>> There are numerous ding marks on the body and the lens shield
>>> has a jaded edge from being banged around. I'm guessing from all the
>>> wear, it was probably used by a television news crew at one time. The
>>> meter says it has 99 hours of (drum?) use... I'm not sure what that
>>> means. Probably was repaired and the hours reset???
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> There are a lot of negatives about this camera that just didn't feel
>>> right to me. Besides the beat up appearance, it felt uncomfortable to
>>> carry. My friend said it doesn't have a stabilizing feature. Since it
>>> didn't feel comfortable carrying it,
>>> I would most likely have to mount it on a tripod most of the time.
>>>
>>>
>>> I also focus with my left eye and the camera eyepiece is on the left
>>> side. I would hope that could be changed to the other side? It
>>> comes with a 5"-6" square monitor piece. Don't know where that would
>>> fit on. The camera had a lot of different switches. Most of
>>> which seemed ergonomically challenging and confusing. Probably
>>> somewhat of a steep learning curve getting used to it.
>>>
>>> On the positive side the mini-dv receptacle was impeccably clean, The
>>> lens doesn't have any scratches and is much larger than the standard
>>> consumer lens. (I don't remember the focal ranges. It's a canon
>>> lense.). The price is pretty cheap. I was thinking of offering $700 or
>>> so. A new model cost close to $7,000. Although, I'm sure, with all the
>>> newer features, it's a far better camera. A
>>> friend of mind shot some footage on it. He, along with a video type
>>> person, said the footage looked fantastic.
>>>
>>> As you might guess I'm leaning against buying this unit. On the other
>>> hand, for a starter camera, it might be a good camera to learn on. I
>>> could always sell it if it didn't work out.
>>>
>>> Feel welcome to offer your opinion or experiences with using this
>>> camera.
>>>
>>
>>
> pro cameras have 'fixed' viewfinders on the left, so you can see the
> display panels / switches / etc., without too much hassle.
>
> all older pro cameras (afaik) use b&w crt. an lcd at that size is
> utterly useless.
>
> jvc are known for 'cutting edge' semi-pro equipment, the problem is, you
> usually end up bleeding to death over it.
>
> i have never seen jvc equipment used in a pro environment, nor their
> cameras by pro cameramen. that said, they sell an awful lot to event and
> low budget cable...
>
> if it's for a hobby, seems ok. if you intend trying to make money - no
> way.
>
> leslie
Thanks again! Decided not to buy this camera.
Even though the image quality was pretty good, this wasn't a fun camera to
operate.... especially with 'useless' lcd.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|