|
|
Posted by boodybandit on 04/12/07 11:35
"Jay G." <Jay@tmbg.org> wrote in message
news:1w7zvxtntjazr$.bftpqml1a2wp.dlg@40tude.net...
> On Wed, 11 Apr 2007 08:11:31 -0400, boodybandit wrote:
>
>> "Jay G." <Jay@tmbg.org> wrote in message
>> news:jb8puqh15dlb$.pki96luuc5dr.dlg@40tude.net...
>>> On Tue, 10 Apr 2007 09:12:21 -0400, boodybandit wrote:
>>>
>>>> "Jay G." <Jay@tmbg.org> wrote in message
>>>> news:12e8e15jtssug.1uzqdp27j3mba.dlg@40tude.net...
>>>>> On Mon, 9 Apr 2007 08:14:18 -0400, boodybandit wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Wake me when the price of the movies drop to a reasonable price
>>>>>> range.
>>>>>> I can't see paying $25 to 30 bucks for something I most likely will
>>>>>> only watch once.
>>>>>
>>>>> What's the point of buying a movie that you're likely to only watch
>>>>> once,period?
>>>>
>>>> I hardly ever purchase movies at all.
>>>
>>> So why are you complaining about the purchase price? As far as I know,
>>> rental costs are the same.
>>
>> Exactly my point.
>
> No, it's not, you're point was:
> "Wake me when the price of the movies drop to a reasonable price range."
I was referring to:
"I won't pay through the nose for
something that will come out on cable in a month or 3. The only difference
being 1080i / 720p vs 1080p and I don't have to pay cable $30 bucks for
"each" hi-def movie."
I hardly watch DVD movies at all anymore so I surely won't pay double for
hi-def for one viewing. So my original point that you quoted stands as
well. The only movies I purchase at all are (what I consider) blockbuster
titles. I wont even purchase them on hi-def until they drop in price 40 to
60% from what they retail for currently.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|