You are here: Re: VHS vs. DVD - comparing horizontal resolutions « DVD Tech « DVD MP3 AVI MP4 players codecs conversion help
Re: VHS vs. DVD - comparing horizontal resolutions

Posted by Bill Vermillion on 04/15/07 04:05

In article <1176384371.997040.210070@e65g2000hsc.googlegroups.com>,
SFTVratings <SFTVratings_troy@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>Kevin wrote:
>>
>> You mentioned transferring VHS to DVD in your original post? If so, I
>> missed that --- totally. Good for you. You are taking the time and
>> expending the effort to get those classic films and other pieces of video
>> archived in a format that will stand the ravages of time
>
>
>Disagree. Recordable DVDs rely upon a dye to preserve the
>information. That dye, even if protected from sunlight, will fade
>over time. Current estimate is as short as 5 years time.

>The videotape is the better format for long-term storage.

There are DVDs that are designed for archival storage. They
aren't cheap but they are out there.

MAM-A is one. The gold disks remind me of the gold ones
that Kodak used to make years ago - that the mastering labs liked
submissions on.

The new 'Accurcore' media from Sony has impressive specs too.

Bill


--
Bill Vermillion - bv @ wjv . com

 

Navigation:

[Reply to this message]


Удаленная работа для программистов  •  Как заработать на Google AdSense  •  статьи на английском  •  England, UK  •  PHP MySQL CMS Apache Oscommerce  •  Online Business Knowledge Base  •  IT news, forums, messages
Home  •  Search  •  Site Map  •  Set as Homepage  •  Add to Favourites
Разработано в студии "Webous"