|
|
Posted by SFTVratings on 04/17/07 14:13
PDTV wrote:
> Okay, this is really starting to piss me off. I know it might seem
> confusing at first glance, but that's why you need to THINK before you
> go posting something as if it's gospel truth.
>
> The fact is that 1080i or 1080p refers to VERTICAL resolution...
We are not discussing verical resolution. The original post was about
HORIZONTAL resolutions (from left-to-right, inside a square frame
equal to the picture's height, per engineering standard
measurements). I am counting these:
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
Please note that I am an Electrical Engineer.
Don't talk down to me as if I was a college freshman.
I don't like it.
> is called VERTICAL resolution, even though you're counting horizontal
> lines. It's not the orientation of the lines that counts, it's how
> many are stacked VERTICALLY on the screen to make up the image. How
> people continually fuck this up is beyond me, and it really pisses me
> off when someone who has it ass-backwards tries to make himself out to
> be an "authority".
[censored] - I told you I don't like to be talked-down to. My
previous post on HORIZONTAL resolution (per picture height) was 100%
accurate:
Standard 4:3 (measuring the | | | | | horizontally across)
-------------------
240 - standard VHS or Betamax
330 - cable tv
400 - S-VHS or laserdisc
540 - DVD
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|