|
|
Posted by Richard Crowley on 04/19/07 14:54
"Rick Merrill" wrote ...
> Richard Crowley wrote:
>>>> If the video isn't worth the $5/hour cost of the tape, then
>>>> it wasn't worth shooting, and not worth archiving, either.
>>>
>>> It depends on the time-value of the content to the clientell doesn't
>>> it.
>>
>> I don't think I understand the argument?
>
> Recordings of Town Meeting are worth what next year?
Depends. Is the videotape the official/legal "transcript" of
the meeting? Anything happen that somebody might come
back and take issue with, etc. etc. Perhaps as I get older,
the value of historic records seems more important to me.
> Weddings?
Dunno. I try to avoid anything to do with weddings. OTOH,
as we get more and more TV channels to fill with some
sort of "programming", some of those wedding videos
may have some sort of voeuristic value in the brave
new world. :-)
> Wild Animal shots that took days or months to get?
Seems to me that the longer it took to get, the more
valuable it would be.
> Value varies over time, n'est pas?
I guess we'll have to agree to disagree.
To each his own.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|