|
|
Posted by Covenant on 04/22/07 15:03
<afn03488@afn.org> wrote in message
news:1177128439.682491.101300@l77g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...
> On Apr 19, 6:04 pm, imorf <i...@iformRemovethis.com.au> wrote:
>
>> Indeed.
>> They should force all gun owners to at least join and participate in a
>> militia (since that is what their constitution is referring to).
>
> Please explain to me why "A well beaten egg white being necessary
> for the preparation of a good meringue, the right of the people to
> keep and raise chickens shall not be infringed", means that I may
> only raise chickens if I beat egg whites. Why can't I raise chickens
> just to pluck and fry them?
>
> This is just part of the crap that outlawing guns will prevent crime.
> You in Australia should be learning this first hand by now. Laws
> don't prevent crime; they cannot. Laws define crimes and prescribe
> the punishment for their commission. The simplest way to eliminate
> crime is to repeal all laws. No law, no crime. This is unacceptable
> to me, and probably to you also.
>
> Murder is universally a crime; there is already a statute in Virginia
> proscribing it. That law did not prevent 32 murders. What is idiotic
> is the notion of banning private ownership of guns will prevent
> violence. At Virginia Tech, and at Luby's, there was an existing
> ban on firearms. If the victims had carried their own weapons
> in violation of this ban, FEWER people would have died.
Now I hope EVERYONE has read this and now realises there is NO CORRELATION
between owning a gun and shooting someone, and NOT owning a gun and NOT
shooting someone with it.
And you'd be a fool and a communist to think there IS !
(Ref?? Diff. 4/5)
--
Covenant
A Man Snipping The Trollage...
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|