|
|
Posted by WinField on 04/24/07 14:43
Nelly wrote:
> Derek Janssen wrote:
>
>> Jay G. wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, 23 Apr 2007 12:30:50 -0500, def456 wrote:
>>>
>>>> But the people in the picture are too small. I have a 25" TV with
>>>> 4:3 aspect ratio.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> As someone who used to watch 2.35:1 films on a 20" 4:3 TV, I have no
>>> sympathy for your position. I'd much rather have the correct image than
>>> one that shows me the incorrect image larger.
>>
>>
>> Also, while widescreen movies are processed more or less in their
>> original theatrical form, fullscreen movies have to be separately
>> RE-processed for FS disk--
>> Which means the 4:3 version will look slightly blurrier, zoomed-in and
>> second-generation.
>>
>> If you bought a DVD player for clarity, fullscreen movies bring you
>> right back to the VHS.
>>
>> Derek Janssen
>> ejanss@comcast.net
>
>
> That's bullshit! I have both versions of The DaVinci Code and except
> for the size and shape of the display, there is no blurriness
> whatsoever. The clarity is the same on both.
>
> Perhaps this person can't afford a "better" tv. Not everyone has money
> falling out of their ass to buy luxury items on a whim.
Thanks for tossing Derek's pile of bovine excrement back into his tea-room.
I have at least 4 movies in both WS and FS formats. I still watch using
one of two 27" and a 36" TV - depending on mood, room and visitors.
Janssen is full of beans when he claims slightly blurrier,
second-generation quality on full-screen processed flicks.
Zoomed-in!? Well, yeah ... duh. 8|
- winf
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|