|
|
Posted by SuperM on 04/25/07 09:04
On Tue, 24 Apr 2007 21:33:10 -0400, Derek Janssen <ejanss@comcast.net>
Gave us:
>SuperM wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 24 Apr 2007 06:50:25 -0700, "Richard C."
>> <post-age@spamcop.net> Gave us:
>>
>>>Top posting has its purpose.
>>
>> So does flogging.
>>
>> Sheesh, you can't even take a joke right.
>
>Well, let's look at the posts in the last 24 hours:
>- Bulk responses? = Check.
Wrong. I read and respond one post at a time. Even though they show
up in this group, which doesn't get much action(clue), look at the
times for each post, idiot.
>- "No top posting" in lieu of actual content? = Check
It was a joke, dumbshit. Check yourself.
>- Geek-credibility "Your theater system will pay for itself in 10
>years!" investment-delusions? = Check.
Never said any such thing... ever.
>- "Retard" obsession? = Che....uh, wait, looks like we're missing
>something here.
You're seeming pretty obsessed, stalk boy.
>Guess someone's laying low under the new screenname in the hopes of
>building "credibility" again, hoping to get back into the "Mine's better
>than yours" threads again with a clean slate.
You're an idiot. = check.
>...Oh, well, allow us to shoot those chances all to heck--
>Now we can get back to group-ostracizing his entire existence again. :)
Proof of your trolldom. = check.
>(Oh, and Rich, let's see: You said, what, new screenname in two weeks?
Wrong, and you don't even have a clue as to why, nor is it any of
your business, little boy.
>Hmm, held out a little longer than we thought, although not sure if we
>can technically count "SuperMassive" as a *new* screenname--
You can't even get that right. It is SuperM@ssive. There is no "a",
idiot.
>We'll have
>to get a ruling on that one, but betting pools open on the next?)
>
Who are you going to get the ruling from, one of your other
personalities?
>Derek Janssen (in poker, it's never about the cards, it's about the tells)
>ejanss@comcast.net
Yeah... you just provide quite a few, boy. All about you.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|