|
|
Posted by Niemadre on 04/25/07 23:35
On Wed, 25 Apr 2007 02:04:10 -0700, SuperM
<SuperM@ssiveBlackHoleAtTheCenterOfTheMilkyWayGalaxy.org> wrote:
>On Tue, 24 Apr 2007 21:33:10 -0400, Derek Janssen <ejanss@comcast.net>
>Gave us:
>
>>SuperM wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, 24 Apr 2007 06:50:25 -0700, "Richard C."
>>> <post-age@spamcop.net> Gave us:
>>>
>>>>Top posting has its purpose.
>>>
>>> So does flogging.
>>>
>>> Sheesh, you can't even take a joke right.
>>
>>Well, let's look at the posts in the last 24 hours:
>>- Bulk responses? = Check.
>
> Wrong. I read and respond one post at a time. Even though they show
>up in this group, which doesn't get much action(clue), look at the
>times for each post, idiot.
>
>>- "No top posting" in lieu of actual content? = Check
>
> It was a joke, dumbshit. Check yourself.
>
>>- Geek-credibility "Your theater system will pay for itself in 10
>>years!" investment-delusions? = Check.
>
> Never said any such thing... ever.
>
>>- "Retard" obsession? = Che....uh, wait, looks like we're missing
>>something here.
>
> You're seeming pretty obsessed, stalk boy.
>
>>Guess someone's laying low under the new screenname in the hopes of
>>building "credibility" again, hoping to get back into the "Mine's better
>>than yours" threads again with a clean slate.
>
> You're an idiot. = check.
>
>>...Oh, well, allow us to shoot those chances all to heck--
>>Now we can get back to group-ostracizing his entire existence again. :)
>
> Proof of your trolldom. = check.
>
>>(Oh, and Rich, let's see: You said, what, new screenname in two weeks?
>
> Wrong, and you don't even have a clue as to why, nor is it any of
>your business, little boy.
>
>>Hmm, held out a little longer than we thought, although not sure if we
>>can technically count "SuperMassive" as a *new* screenname--
>
> You can't even get that right. It is SuperM@ssive. There is no "a",
>idiot.
>
>>We'll have
>>to get a ruling on that one, but betting pools open on the next?)
>>
> Who are you going to get the ruling from, one of your other
>personalities?
>
>>Derek Janssen (in poker, it's never about the cards, it's about the tells)
>>ejanss@comcast.net
>
> Yeah... you just provide quite a few, boy. All about you.
This show what a usenet abuser you are.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|