|
|
Posted by Jay G. on 04/26/07 01:20
On Wed, 25 Apr 2007 17:05:14 -0700, SuperM wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Apr 2007 08:28:43 -0400, "Jay G." <Jay@tmbg.org> Gave us:
>
>> However, referring to it as just "anamorphic"
>>is perfectly correct as well.
>
> Anamorphic lenses... anamorphic DVD for use on 4:3 OR WS
> displays...
>
> two different things.
>
> What would any director or cinematographer call it?
Anamorphic
From:
http://www.cinematography.net/Lenses%20TOC.htm
16mm Anamorphic Lenses : Additional Information
Anamorphic Lens For Projection
Anamorphic Lenses On HD
Anamorphic Lenses & Super 35
Anamorphic Shooting
Anamorphic Solutions & Uprezzed Outputs
http://www.cinematography.net/Camera%20TOC.htm
16mm Anamorphic
16mm Anamorphic Lenses
Anamorphics - 2 Perf
Anamorphic Entry
Anamorphic Lenses & Super 35
Anamorphic Shooting
Anamorphic Super 16mm
Anamorphic Super16mm To A 35mm Print
Anamorphic_Viewfinder_For_16mm
Clairmont Anamorphics On 16mm
S16 Anamorphic & Underwater
http://www.cinematography.net/Pages%20DW/AG-DVX100wAnamorphic169.htm
> SCOPE, or Cinemascope.
Cinemascope doesn't appear on those pages at all. Scope only appears as a
term in one title in the Camera list, "3 Perf & Super 35mm For Scope," and
in the actual article for that the writers use the term "anamorphic"
frequently and interchangeably.
> Anamorphic is a methodology. I find it in err to use it as a name,
> regardless of whether or not it is or has been so.
Anamorphic is the proper name for the process, CinemaScope is simply a
brand name. It's like referring to photocopying as Xeroxing, even if it's
not on a Xerox brand machine. Everyone knows what you mean when you say
Xeroxing, but calling it photocopying is perfectly legitimate as well.
-Jay
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|