|
|
Posted by WinField on 04/26/07 03:17
Justin wrote:
> WinField wrote on [Wed, 25 Apr 2007 13:11:32 -0700]:
>
>>Results: the FS version had noticeably better detail. When the WS frame
>>was zoomed to approximate the FS view, the full-screen picture actually
>>looked high-definition compared to what the 27" WS TV was showing.
>>Sharks! & yes, Derek IS a gerbil-butt.
>
>
> How did the FS version look when at the same zoom level?
>
> If not, then you lose. Bye now.
The FS version (zoomed-up) looks like you do when you get up in the
morning. Pretty scary and crappy. =)
But your point is valid. What I did tonight is swap the movie playback
test between the two TVs. WS on the newer 36" Sony, and the FS on the
27" JVC. And no zooming around. Just a straight-up on-the-rocks test.
Results: much closer, but FS still has a bit more detail.
The WS on the big TV still has a tad smaller Bond & Jinx, etc. And
newer electronics seem to really help out. The Sony really makes Jinx
look G-O-O-D. But even with much older chassis, the JVC plays FS "Die
Another Day" look a bit crisper and a bit more detailed.
- winf
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|