|
|
Posted by SuperM on 04/28/07 00:10
On Fri, 27 Apr 2007 00:06:54 -0500, Fake Name <fakename@fake.com> Gave
us:
>>You realize that the up to 43% of the movie that is cropped in a
>>pan-and-scan
>>version has Z E RO resolution!
>
>There are several 35mm film standards with varying aspect ratios. Some
>are cropped down from 4:3 to 16:9 and in those cases there is more
>information on the 4:3 version. The recent exposure of Jennifer
>Aniston's breasts is an example of a 4:3 to 16:9 crop.
>
>I prefer 16:9 simply because that is how the movie was meant to be
>viewed.
>
>Take a look at the Criterion edition of Lawrence of Arabia sometime.
>It was shot in 70mm and in 16:9.
That's why he said UP TO 43%.
I do not agree that any cropped or P & S version has "more
information". PERHAPS SOME have a bit "more above, and or below, but
the total sum is LESS in every case as far as I am concerned, and that
is not to mention that it is a sad aspect ration to view such works
in.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|