|
|
Posted by Justin on 04/28/07 02:24
Jay G. wrote on [Fri, 27 Apr 2007 22:09:38 -0400]:
> On Thu, 26 Apr 2007 09:21:11 -0500, Justin wrote:
>
>> Jay G. wrote on [Thu, 26 Apr 2007 08:51:13 -0400]:
>>> On Wed, 25 Apr 2007 23:23:36 -0500, Justin wrote:
>>>
>>>> Jay G. wrote on [Wed, 25 Apr 2007 22:55:03 -0400]:
>>>>
>>>>> The zoom comparison was likely in
>>>>> response to those who replied that the OP should just zoom in the 2.35:1
>>>>> image if he wanted a 4:3 image.
>>>>
>>>> That wasn't stated or even mentioned.
>>>
>>> On Mon, 23 Apr 2007 12:27:54 -0500, Aaron J. Bossig wrote:
>>>> Today, most TVs ship with some form of zoom option...
>>>> If you need to fill your screen, this would be the best bet.
>>
>> This is a different post from the one I replied to, by a different
>> person.
>
> You're correct. It was posted elsewhere in this thread, before Winfield's
> post that you responded to. Sometimes you need the context of a whole
> conversation before you can properly understand one part of it.
However, the post was talking about Derek's assertion that WS was
clearer than FS due to reprocessing. Zooming was mentioned in reference
to showing similar amounts of full screen usage. Not in reference to
"just zoom in" posts.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|