|
|
Posted by The Great Attractor on 05/06/07 23:36
On Sun, 6 May 2007 19:00:20 -0400, "Rich Clark"
<rdclark2SPAM@TRAPcomcast.net> wrote:
>
>"NRen2k5" <nomore@email.com> wrote in message
>news:jMi%h.6432$PM5.14642@weber.videotron.net...
>> Jonathan Brisby wrote:
>>> O_o You paid to get a widescreen TV and now you wanna cut the sides
>>> off? This boggles my mind.
>>
>> It makes sense to me. The movie is 2.35:1. The screen is 1.78:1. There
>> are black bars at the top and bottom. But maybe somehow by cutting the
>> sides off of the movie it can be made to fit the 1.78:1 screen.
>>
>> Myself, I wouldn't mind too much. It wouldn't be as bad as watching the
>> movie on a 1.33:1 screen.
>
>Un. Fucking. Believable.
>
>Cut of Mona Lisa's head because you happen to have a frame that's more
>square than the painting. That makes so much sense.
>
>
Nobody cut off anything idiot.
That framing is what the director intended.
For you to think that the movie was clipped to make it widescreen shows
how little you know about film making.
The is a BIG difference between a still PORTRAIT, and a FILM, which
nearly ALWAYS depicts wider vista in the scope of their shots.
Come back when you get a clue.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|