|
|
Posted by nappy on 05/07/07 17:16
"Bill" <trash@chromehorse.net> wrote in message
news:FvudnT9JeuyyzaLbnZ2dnUVZ_oupnZ2d@golden.net...
> Take the 4:3 stuff, use Cineon or some other software to render it out to
> look like 16mm film, stretch it to cover the 16:9 proportions, and charge
> extra for the "classic" film look on portions of the video.
>
> Seriously... if the camera is good quality, like a VX2000 or similar, it
> won't look bad in standard definition, and if it was close-up on the
> bride, you have some room to maneuver. It may not even look all that bad
> in HD.
>
> Personally, I'd make full disclosure. If the quality of the 4:3 is good,
> you might try this: "we feel that the impact on the quality of your video
> will not be great and would like you to view the final product to
> determine for yourself. If you feel in any way that the quality is not
> what you expected, we are willing to negotiate a discount with you."
agreed. Especially the full disclosure part. But.. maybe do it AFTER you
have setup your method for cutting this footage in. Then, you ought to be
able to show them and they.. will .. like it.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|