|
|
Posted by Woden on 05/17/07 19:46
> Well sorry if it seemed to be an obvious answer, but..... if that recent
> version is "re-mastered" then there's something seriously wrong somewhere.
> Further, another 5 versions does not mean to me that they are going to
> change their track record and release a quality product. It may mean they
> are going to release another 5 substandard version at a hefty price tag,
> which would seem to fit their modus operandi. I would love a couple of
> different versions, but I'd very happily settle for one decent version.
>
> Do you know that a high quality version will be included? Sources please.
Have you compared the remastered to the original release? Vast differences
in picture quality....but that was all - it was only a remastered picture
and nothing else.
You had a release that was a film-only. At least the new one will be with
extras. Rare versions and will probably get an HD release. Did the recent
one get an HD release? I believe it did.
I'm just the messenger bud - we've never had a 'decent' release of Blade
Runner - this looks to be it.
Why so down?
At least it's not LOTR or Star Wars with a new version every six months!
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|