|
|
Posted by Jan Panteltje on 05/18/07 17:15
On a sunny day (Fri, 18 May 2007 14:32:09 GMT) it happened "David McCall"
<news@junk.us> wrote in <JNi3i.4$YW1.0@trnddc04>:
>> 10) duh
>>
>I'll bet you said the same thing about XP back when you were still using
>2000.
You lose, now pay the 100$ and go to jail...
:-)
I left MS sof[t]ware when Linux 0.98 or so came out, at that time win3.1 was
on most computers...
I still have some disk with win98, and indeed I sometimes boot win98 for Epson PrintCD
and my Canon scanner driver.
>Yes there are reasons to switch from linux to XP. It's called available
>software.
Well I use linux, and can boot an antique PC in windows 98 as indicated above,
not for any 'real work', printcd also runs in Linux wine, but then sometimes gets confused.
>There used to be a program that could up-rez an image through fancy
>interpolation.
>Then there was the Snappy from Play that used multiple frames to help with
>the
>interpolating to achieve a beter quality image.
Absolutely.
My view (I am at an advantage here) is: in Linux if it does not exist,
and I *really* need it, I write it.
>No matter how fancy the interpolation, you still only have the
>data that was in the original image. Interpolation at it's best not
>only creates new pixels based on the value of surrounding pixels,
>but it also looks for edges that it can extend into the new pixels.
>It is still just guessing.
>
>David
Well, that issue has been discussed before, it is very old actually,
yes you can get some extra information from a mjpeg series of jpgs.
Video (as it is now) is really quite simple, just 2 dimensional math
over one or more frames (rectangulars).
When 3D really takes off.... we will have some learning curve again.
:-)
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|