Posted by Justin on 05/28/07 13:51

JackShephard wrote on [Mon, 28 May 2007 00:52:57 -0700]:
> On Sun, 27 May 2007 22:51:09 -0500, Justin <nospam@insightbb.com> wrote:
>
>>Stan Brown wrote on [Sun, 27 May 2007 23:39:51 -0400]:
>>> Sun, 27 May 2007 22:26:24 -0400 from Derek Janssen
>>> <ejanss@nospam.comcast.net>:
>>>> (Um, we know the "Nitpick red-herring" defense is the standard
>>>> troll-dodge arsenal, but on the larger strategy, does it really HELP the
>>>> image to look like sarcasm and irony zoom miles over your head?:
>>>
>>> What I don't get is why you and other people keep responding to the
>>> troll. Since a troll thrives on *all* attention, positive and
>>> negative, surely the only effective way to deal with a troll is to
>>> ignore it.
>>
>>Because he likes to interject his opinion in on everything.
>
>
> Nope. I have responded in ONE thread in the last week.

Follow the attributions, you'll realise it isn't you I was talking
about.

> Could you really be as clueless as the rest of the idiots here, Justin?

Nope, but perhaps you are?

• Next in forum: Re: "Get a Life" Tv series from 1990-1991
• Prev in forum: Re: RW DVDs: Any Advantage To 16x In A 4x Machine?
• Thread view: Re: What program do you like for keeping track of your DVDs?

[Reply to this message]