|
Posted by JackShephard on 05/28/07 23:12
On Mon, 28 May 2007 08:51:28 -0500, Justin <nospam@insightbb.com> wrote:
>JackShephard wrote on [Mon, 28 May 2007 00:52:57 -0700]:
>> On Sun, 27 May 2007 22:51:09 -0500, Justin <nospam@insightbb.com> wrote:
>>
>>>Stan Brown wrote on [Sun, 27 May 2007 23:39:51 -0400]:
>>>> Sun, 27 May 2007 22:26:24 -0400 from Derek Janssen
>>>> <ejanss@nospam.comcast.net>:
>>>>> (Um, we know the "Nitpick red-herring" defense is the standard
>>>>> troll-dodge arsenal, but on the larger strategy, does it really HELP the
>>>>> image to look like sarcasm and irony zoom miles over your head?:
>>>>
>>>> What I don't get is why you and other people keep responding to the
>>>> troll. Since a troll thrives on *all* attention, positive and
>>>> negative, surely the only effective way to deal with a troll is to
>>>> ignore it.
>>>
>>>Because he likes to interject his opinion in on everything.
>>
>>
>> Nope. I have responded in ONE thread in the last week.
>
>Follow the attributions, you'll realise it isn't you I was talking
>about.
>
Ahhh... it's all clear to me now. The guy that likes to put peanut
gallery idiotic remarks in his sig... Yeah. Sorry 'bout the jab, then.
>> Could you really be as clueless as the rest of the idiots here, Justin?
>
>Nope, but perhaps you are?
Occasionally, perhaps, but I doubt it as they are pretty far down the
totem pole.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|