|
|
Posted by Bill Vermillion on 01/11/06 04:55
In article <43c3c6d5.4892640@news-server.houston.rr.com>,
Bob <spam@uce.gov> wrote:
>On Mon, 09 Jan 2006 19:45:38 GMT, Roy L. Fuchs
><roylfuchs@urfargingicehole.org> wrote:
>
>>On 9 Jan 2006 07:25:16 -0800, "NYC XYZ" <jack_foreigner@yahoo.com>
>>Gave us:
>
>>>Please post your mailing address. I want to forward you a copy of
>>>"Humor for Dummies."
>
>>>Or do you prefer the "For Idiots" version?
>
>> So, now the top posting, utter Usenet retard thinks he is amusing as
>>well. You don't even come close, dipshit.
>
>> Do you know ANYTHING about Usenet, boy?
>
>> Hey, fuktard, DVDs do NOT get burned. Your at home crap is NOT an
>>example of how mass produced DVDs get made. Get that through your
>>fucking retarded brain.
>
>---
>
>Copyright 2006 CNET Networks, Inc.
>
>Create an e-annoyance, go to jail
>By Declan McCullagh
>Published: January 9, 2006, 4:00 AM PST
>
>Annoying someone via the Internet is now a federal crime.
>It's no joke. Last Thursday, President Bush signed into law a
>prohibition on posting annoying Web messages or sending annoying
>e-mail messages without disclosing your true identity.
Someone is making big assumptions that the US controls the internet
if that is the case.
And there still exist some anonymous remailers - though the biggest
ones from years ago aren't around anymore.
Now if this is going to be a federal crime who are the people who
are going to enforce it. Pull some of the people from scanning
at airports? Remove some border patrols?
All the regulation were someone wants to control what someone else
says is getting a bit ridiculous.
Bill
--
Bill Vermillion - bv @ wjv . com
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|