|
|
Posted by JackShephard on 06/01/07 23:55
On Fri, 01 Jun 2007 12:36:45 -0700, elrous0@pop.uky.edu wrote:
>On Jun 1, 1:38 am, "Jay G." <J...@tmbg.org> wrote:
>> Nobody agreed with you then either.
>
>Just because you're fucking idiots and I'm not doesn't make for a
>defense.
>
You are most certainly a fucking retard.
>Nice to know that the widescreen zealot is still alive and well here
>on alt.video.dvd, though.
Wouldn't you wanting displays to be 2.35:1 make YOU the zealot, idiot?
16:9 was the proper choice. An entire industry full of experts are
certainly brainier than a dipshit like you could ever be.
> Takes me back to the early days of this
>group, when someone who dared question widescreen would immediately
>get 50 replies threatening to sodomize his dog.
Someone that is an advocate of a chopped up version of a flic should
get his nuts snipped, at the very least.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|