|
|
Posted by Observer on 06/02/07 22:19
"blu" <not@this.tm> wrote in message
news:Xns99438786B28DEutb@207.14.116.130...
> Brandon D Cartwright <user@example.net> wrote in
> news:knj16395m57slqrt85chj4ekee70gdruki@4ax.com:
>
>> On Fri, 01 Jun 2007 18:07:01 -0700, JackShephard
>> <SomewhereOnTheLOSTIsland@Sumplaceintime.org> wrote:
>>
>>>On Fri, 01 Jun 2007 17:33:24 -0700, Brandon D Cartwright
>>><user@example.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>You are very found of hurling death threats and threatening to report
>>>>anyone who stands up to you.
>>>
>>>
>>> Again, you fucking liar. WHERE did I ever write a death threat, you
>>>retarded fuck?
>>>
>>> Telling Terrell that I hope his teeth kill him is NOT an example.
>>>
>>> Get your shit straight, fuckhead.
>>
>> Very Clever.
>>
>> "JackShephard" did not but MassiveProng did regularly.
>>
>> Remember Blu and the car accident?
>
> Like it was yesterday.
>
>> The burial in the canyon?
>
> Yes. But that was Prong, who, apparently, has no association with this
> Sheppard fellow. Ayup yup yup..
>
>
>> Are you actually going to have the sheer audacity to pretend you are
>> not MassiveProng posting under a different name, to avoid being kill
>> filed and to try to shrug off your vile history like a snake shedding
>> it's skin?
>
> Sure. There's enough audacity to go around several times, with a pinch
> left over to toss from the top of an arch. Into Ohio.
So let's be clear her so he can't squirm out of it.
Have I got this right it seems plain evil.
Prong wanted a female (you) murdered because your partner consistently
exposed him in usenet arguments?
Did you consider going to the authorities?
I know it's probably his usual psychotic nonsense and he is statistically
most likey to die by his own hand, but these kooks do sometimes go off the
rails
and attack people innocent people because of something going on in their
diseased minds.
He ceratinly fits the classic profile.
The Psychopathology of a Stalker
http://www.crimelibrary.com/notorious_murders/classics/jill_dando/3.html
Katherine Ramsland in her article, "Stalkers: The Psychological Terrorists,"
presents the definition of a stalker, which is according to U.S.
legislation, a person who "willfully, maliciously and repeatedly follows or
harasses" another person and who threatens the safety of that person or
their immediate family. Recently stalking has gained a great deal of media
attention due to several high profile cases in which celebrities have been
murdered or assaulted by obsessed stalkers. The problem has often been
believed to have been one suffered exclusively by females, especially those
who are continuously in the public eye. According to Dr. Phillip Resnick of
Case Western Reserve University, one in 12 women is stalked by either sex at
one time throughout her life.
Dr. Reid Meloy, author of several books on stalking and a leading expert on
stalking behavior, stated that stalkers are mostly middle-aged men who
develop pathological attachments and usually follow a predictable pattern of
behavior. He describes the progression of a stalker in his book The
Psychology of Stalking, as one which begins with infatuation-like feelings,
eventually followed by contact with the person of interest. Contact with the
person often ends in rejection, which Meloy states, "triggers the delusion
through which the stalker projects his own feelings onto the object: She
loves me, too." He further explains that the stalker hides his shame with
anger, leading to the desire to control or injure the person being stalked.
Often, the stalker will attempt to fulfill his fantasy by devaluing the
person and controlling the individual through violence.
1.. Non-domestic stalker, who has no personal relationship with the
victim
2.. Organized
3.. Delusional
stalkers are more likely to be middle-aged, unemployed, obsessed,
psychopathic men. However, one can not and should not myopically view all
stalkers as such. Stalkers and their victims are not limited to any
particular gender, age, sex, race or culture. Thus, anyone at anytime or
anywhere can be stalked. Ramsland does state that although many stalkers do
threaten their victims, only a "small percentage carry out their threat."
Unfortunately, there is no way to differentiate between those who make idle
threats and those who actually follow through.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|