|
|
Posted by blu on 06/03/07 15:01
"Observer" <no.not@thistime.com> wrote in
news:1363r8g8iq2su14@corp.supernews.com:
>
> "blu" <not@this.tm> wrote in message
> news:Xns99438786B28DEutb@207.14.116.130...
>> Brandon D Cartwright <user@example.net> wrote in
>> news:knj16395m57slqrt85chj4ekee70gdruki@4ax.com:
>>
>>> On Fri, 01 Jun 2007 18:07:01 -0700, JackShephard
>>> <SomewhereOnTheLOSTIsland@Sumplaceintime.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Fri, 01 Jun 2007 17:33:24 -0700, Brandon D Cartwright
>>>><user@example.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>You are very found of hurling death threats and threatening to
>>>>>report anyone who stands up to you.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Again, you fucking liar. WHERE did I ever write a death threat,
>>>> you
>>>>retarded fuck?
>>>>
>>>> Telling Terrell that I hope his teeth kill him is NOT an example.
>>>>
>>>> Get your shit straight, fuckhead.
>>>
>>> Very Clever.
>>>
>>> "JackShephard" did not but MassiveProng did regularly.
>>>
>>> Remember Blu and the car accident?
>>
>> Like it was yesterday.
>>
>>> The burial in the canyon?
>>
>> Yes. But that was Prong, who, apparently, has no association with
>> this Sheppard fellow. Ayup yup yup..
>>
>>
>>> Are you actually going to have the sheer audacity to pretend you are
>>> not MassiveProng posting under a different name, to avoid being kill
>>> filed and to try to shrug off your vile history like a snake
>>> shedding it's skin?
>>
>> Sure. There's enough audacity to go around several times, with a
>> pinch left over to toss from the top of an arch. Into Ohio.
>
> So let's be clear her so he can't squirm out of it.
>
> Have I got this right it seems plain evil.
>
> Prong wanted a female (you) murdered because your partner
> consistently exposed him in usenet arguments?
>
> Did you consider going to the authorities?
What he said was something along these lines:
"I hope you die in a wreck in the Eisenhower Tunnel" then there was
something about being buried in the canyon. (ie: not being found.. just
left there forever)
He never said he wanted to *personally* do me any harm, just that he
wished it would happen.
He's ineffectual even in his "death threats"
And no, I'd never even thought about going to the authorities about him.
He's a kook who likes to type all big and bad, but I suspect that in
real life, he'd be afraid to say two words to a woman.
> I know it's probably his usual psychotic nonsense and he is
> statistically most likey to die by his own hand, but these kooks do
> sometimes go off the rails
> and attack people innocent people because of something going on in
> their
> diseased minds.
Well, to do anything to me, he'd have to either drive or fly here, which
is about 1,080 miles. I doubt he's k00k enough to do that.
> He ceratinly fits the classic profile.
>
>
> The Psychopathology of a Stalker
>
> http://www.crimelibrary.com/notorious_murders/classics/jill_dando/3.h
t
> ml
>
> Katherine Ramsland in her article, "Stalkers: The Psychological
> Terrorists," presents the definition of a stalker, which is according
> to U.S. legislation, a person who "willfully, maliciously and
> repeatedly follows or harasses" another person and who threatens the
> safety of that person or their immediate family. Recently stalking has
> gained a great deal of media attention due to several high profile
> cases in which celebrities have been murdered or assaulted by obsessed
> stalkers. The problem has often been believed to have been one
> suffered exclusively by females, especially those who are continuously
> in the public eye. According to Dr. Phillip Resnick of Case Western
> Reserve University, one in 12 women is stalked by either sex at one
> time throughout her life.
>
> Dr. Reid Meloy, author of several books on stalking and a leading
> expert on
> stalking behavior, stated that stalkers are mostly middle-aged men who
> develop pathological attachments and usually follow a predictable
> pattern of behavior. He describes the progression of a stalker in his
> book The Psychology of Stalking, as one which begins with
> infatuation-like feelings, eventually followed by contact with the
> person of interest. Contact with the person often ends in rejection,
> which Meloy states, "triggers the delusion through which the stalker
> projects his own feelings onto the object: She loves me, too." He
> further explains that the stalker hides his shame with anger, leading
> to the desire to control or injure the person being stalked. Often,
> the stalker will attempt to fulfill his fantasy by devaluing the
> person and controlling the individual through violence.
>
>
> 1.. Non-domestic stalker, who has no personal relationship with
> the
> victim
> 2.. Organized
> 3.. Delusional
> stalkers are more likely to be middle-aged, unemployed, obsessed,
> psychopathic men. However, one can not and should not myopically view
> all stalkers as such. Stalkers and their victims are not limited to
> any particular gender, age, sex, race or culture. Thus, anyone at
> anytime or anywhere can be stalked. Ramsland does state that although
> many stalkers do threaten their victims, only a "small percentage
> carry out their threat." Unfortunately, there is no way to
> differentiate between those who make idle threats and those who
> actually follow through.
He's delusional, alright. But stalking takes *work* and somehow, I just
don't see him putting the effort into it.
--
blu*goddess.of.groundhogs*juju
blu 3=3
master of irrelevance
Dr Chung's Homewrecker
Lits Slut#5
Gutter Chix0r #2
The Hate Machine Cog #6
Cancel my subscription to the resurrection.
-Jim Morrison http://blu05.port5.com/
"This whole deal has gone nineteen." -Eddie
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|