|
|
Posted by JackShephard on 06/03/07 19:13
On Sat, 2 Jun 2007 15:19:52 -0700, "Observer" <no.not@thistime.com>
wrote:
>
>"blu" <not@this.tm> wrote in message
>news:Xns99438786B28DEutb@207.14.116.130...
>> Brandon D Cartwright <user@example.net> wrote in
>> news:knj16395m57slqrt85chj4ekee70gdruki@4ax.com:
>>
>>> On Fri, 01 Jun 2007 18:07:01 -0700, JackShephard
>>> <SomewhereOnTheLOSTIsland@Sumplaceintime.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Fri, 01 Jun 2007 17:33:24 -0700, Brandon D Cartwright
>>>><user@example.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>You are very found of hurling death threats and threatening to report
>>>>>anyone who stands up to you.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Again, you fucking liar. WHERE did I ever write a death threat, you
>>>>retarded fuck?
>>>>
>>>> Telling Terrell that I hope his teeth kill him is NOT an example.
>>>>
>>>> Get your shit straight, fuckhead.
>>>
>>> Very Clever.
>>>
>>> "JackShephard" did not but MassiveProng did regularly.
>>>
>>> Remember Blu and the car accident?
>>
>> Like it was yesterday.
>>
>>> The burial in the canyon?
>>
>> Yes. But that was Prong, who, apparently, has no association with this
>> Sheppard fellow. Ayup yup yup..
>>
>>
>>> Are you actually going to have the sheer audacity to pretend you are
>>> not MassiveProng posting under a different name, to avoid being kill
>>> filed and to try to shrug off your vile history like a snake shedding
>>> it's skin?
>>
>> Sure. There's enough audacity to go around several times, with a pinch
>> left over to toss from the top of an arch. Into Ohio.
>
>So let's be clear her so he can't squirm out of it.
>
>Have I got this right it seems plain evil.
>
>Prong wanted a female (you) murdered because your partner consistently
>exposed him in usenet arguments?
You're an idiot. No such thing even happened. Ever.
>
>Did you consider going to the authorities?
They would have laughed at her FALSE claim that she had been
threatened.
>
>I know it's probably his usual psychotic nonsense and he is statistically
>most likey to die by his own hand, but these kooks do sometimes go off the
>rails
> and attack people innocent people because of something going on in their
>diseased minds.
>
You're an idiot.
>He ceratinly fits the classic profile.
You don't have the station to make an assessment of someone else, you
total piece of shit. It is not in your purview to do so either, so fuck
off.
>
>The Psychopathology of a Stalker
You want to analyze Lamey for that title.
> http://www.crimelibrary.com/notorious_murders/classics/jill_dando/3.html
>
>Katherine Ramsland in her article, "Stalkers: The Psychological Terrorists,"
>presents the definition of a stalker, which is according to U.S.
>legislation, a person who "willfully, maliciously and repeatedly follows or
>harasses" another person and who threatens the safety of that person or
>their immediate family. Recently stalking has gained a great deal of media
>attention due to several high profile cases in which celebrities have been
>murdered or assaulted by obsessed stalkers. The problem has often been
>believed to have been one suffered exclusively by females, especially those
>who are continuously in the public eye. According to Dr. Phillip Resnick of
>Case Western Reserve University, one in 12 women is stalked by either sex at
>one time throughout her life.
>
> Dr. Reid Meloy, author of several books on stalking and a leading expert on
>stalking behavior, stated that stalkers are mostly middle-aged men who
>develop pathological attachments and usually follow a predictable pattern of
>behavior. He describes the progression of a stalker in his book The
>Psychology of Stalking, as one which begins with infatuation-like feelings,
>eventually followed by contact with the person of interest. Contact with the
>person often ends in rejection, which Meloy states, "triggers the delusion
>through which the stalker projects his own feelings onto the object: She
>loves me, too." He further explains that the stalker hides his shame with
>anger, leading to the desire to control or injure the person being stalked.
>Often, the stalker will attempt to fulfill his fantasy by devaluing the
>person and controlling the individual through violence.
>
>
> 1.. Non-domestic stalker, who has no personal relationship with the
>victim
> 2.. Organized
> 3.. Delusional
>stalkers are more likely to be middle-aged, unemployed, obsessed,
>psychopathic men. However, one can not and should not myopically view all
>stalkers as such. Stalkers and their victims are not limited to any
>particular gender, age, sex, race or culture. Thus, anyone at anytime or
>anywhere can be stalked. Ramsland does state that although many stalkers do
>threaten their victims, only a "small percentage carry out their threat."
>Unfortunately, there is no way to differentiate between those who make idle
>threats and those who actually follow through.
>
You need to look at Lamey, Brandon, and MeatTurd for examples of that.
Fuck off till you get it right, dumbfuck.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|