|
|
Posted by khee mao on 06/05/07 14:14
"Heinrich Galland" <heinrichg@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:040620072115535279%heinrichg@hotmail.com...
> In article <eKGdnSqoPIZY5fnbnZ2dnUVZ_gGdnZ2d@comcast.com>, infiltrate
> <googoogaga@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>> > Exactly...you gotta pay for quality.
>> wrong. sure sometimes its like that but a lot of times thats the way the
>> marketers want you to think. i have a $20 timex non-digital watch that
>> for
>> the last 5yrs has kept perfect time even after it getting banged,etc...
>>
>>
>
> As apposed to Rolex which cost $20,000 and looses a minute or two a day!
>
>
1) no watch or clock keeps perfect time, not even atomic clocks.
2) someone with a $20,000 Rolex probably doesn't give a shit about being a
minute early or late and probably employs a servant to synchronize all of
his watches to the US Naval Observatory's master clock each and every night.
that said, I rock a Movado which only marks the 12.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|