|
|
Posted by Derek Janssen on 06/08/07 21:12
Lloyd Parsons wrote:
> In article <136je7d47g4vq5f@corp.supernews.com>,
> Doug Jacobs <djacobs@shell.rawbw.com> wrote:
>
> The Matrix set sold quite well considering it was about $80 or more for
> the disks. In sales of disks, BluRay vs HDDVD is about 52:48 or
> somewhere thereabouts. Shows that neither are doing as well as some had
> hoped.
No, just that post-Christmas Blu spike, after all the PS3
gamerz/cheapskates got their free disk in the mail, had now been matched
by everyone latching onto a Toshiba HD in May, after the $299 player got
in all the headlines...
Proving that people STILL don't know the difference yet; they're just
still too darn cheap to care. :)
Derek Janssen (which, as noted, pretty well lets out PS3 at this point)
ejanss@comcast.net
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|