|
|
Posted by JackShephard on 06/10/07 06:42
On Sat, 09 Jun 2007 23:36:52 -0700, dgates <dgates@somedomain.com> wrote:
>On Sat, 9 Jun 2007 23:33:11 -0400, "Robo-man" <duffy12@cox.net> wrote:
>
>>
>>"Beowulfie" <enigma@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>>news:136mqes7a0usodc@corp.supernews.com...
>>> Why in the world has Target put out a "special Target" box Alien with only
>>> the first three movies? Are we supposed to forget number 4? Why not drop
>>> the third also since it was as bad as the fourth one.
>>
>>Even though #3 was a screw up. It still has its moments. But #4 is an
>>abortion. Absolutely unwatchable from start to finish. With NO moments
>>whatsoever. I need an airsick bag just thinking about it.
>
>
>Different strokes, eh? I liked 4 more than 3 by a longshot. In fact,
>I was fairly pleased, walking out of the the theater after seeing it.
>
>I'll take a movie that has a scene like this:
>
>http://i.imdb.com/Photos/Ss/0118583/7113_16_2.jpg
>
>over a movie with a scene like this:
>
>http://i.imdb.com/Photos/Ss/0103644/IMG0038.jpg
>
>:-)
I liked her in Galaxy Quest if you are going to take that perspective!
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|