|
|
Posted by Mike on 06/10/07 22:48
"Gaz" <gazter@msn.com> wrote in message
news:5d3cabF30pov7U1@mid.individual.net...
> mbcUK wrote:
>> Mike wrote:
>>> "mbcUK" <martin.cross8@NOSPAMHEREbtopenworld.com> wrote in message
>>> news:GaSdnXrpO4SkM_bbnZ2dnUVZ8turnZ2d@bt.com...
>>>> Utter, utter sh**e. Never seen a film so poor in my life. If Roth is
>>>> trying to do "torture-porn" he forgot the porn, made only one torture
>>>> scene even remotely hard to view and made a film so one dimensinal,
>>>> predictable and devoid of any real interest.
>>>>
>>>> Even if you didn't hate the first (like me) avoid this like you would
>>>> avoid the actual titular Hostel.
>>>>
>>>> Martin
>>>
>>> first one was suberb, this second one was an absolute disaster.
>>> continuing it on and givng more info about the 'organisation' was a
>>> good idea and there was good scope there for a great film but they
>>> got it completely wrong. an embarrassment for all involved imo
>>
>> Spot on, the ideas were good but bnever reached their potential.
>> Apparently
>> there will not be a third so that's a blessing.
>>
>> Martin
>
> It did start out quite well, I thought we where going to get a good slice
> of what was to come, but alas no....
>
> Gaz
I was gutted the best looking victim never got her kit off :)
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|