|
|
Posted by someone on 06/24/07 04:11
In article <lxlfi.178370$_c5.138006@attbi_s22>, Rufus <not@home.com> wrote:
>
>someone@some.domain.invalid wrote:
>> In article <q8kfi.178277$_c5.52189@attbi_s22>, Rufus <not@home.com> wrote:
>>
>>>someone@some.domain.invalid wrote:
>>>
>>>>In article <rWifi.117023$n_.90817@attbi_s21>, Rufus <not@home.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>someone@some.domain.invalid wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>In article <w0ifi.116968$n_.30953@attbi_s21>, Rufus <not@home.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>someone@some.domain.invalid wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>In article <pan.2007.06.23.18.57.16.476375@earthNOSPAMlink.net>, Greg
>>>>>
>>>>>Heilers
>>>>>
>>>>>>><gNOSPAMheilers@earthNOSPAMlink.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>On Sat, 23 Jun 2007 14:09:19 -0400, Rick Merrill wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>I think this belongs in talk.origins!
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Well, one can understand how or why it was cross-posted
>>>>>>>>>to "rec.models.scale" (even if one does not excuse the
>>>>>>>>>posting), but what does it have to do with a group
>>>>>>>>>such as "alt.food.barbecue?"...lol
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>i want to smother that girl in chocolate syrup and fuck her
>>>>>>>>till the cows come home.
>>>>>>>>-frank zappa
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>....I think it's "boogie till the cows come home"...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>...."only 14, and she knows how to nasty?"
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>his wife's attending an orchid show
>>>>>>she squealed for a week to get him to go
>>>>>>but back in the bed his teenage queen
>>>>>>is rocking and rolling and acting obscene
>>>>>>baby, baby.
>>>>>>the type 1 pressing has fuck her
>>>>>>as well as the backward palyed lines in the first song.
>>>>>>the type 2 was "cleaned up" and sells for $40-200 less
>>>>>>depending on condition.
>>>>>
>>>>>Ah-ha!..I've only heard the one version...
>>>>>
>>>>>....but it's the thought that counts.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>there is one other early moms with slight changes, lumpy
>>>>gravy. price difference is nil because of same number
>>>>pressed. i guess the record co learned something.
>>>
>>>Record companies...are they still around? Don't think I've actually
>>>bought any music since I got a cable modem and net-radio. They've even
>>>got a net-enabled juke at my local...
>>>
>>>Besides, these days any serious and seriously smart band ought to be
>>>producing and distributing thier own stuff direct to the public and not
>>>have to give up a cut. All a band needs a promoter for anymore is to
>>>back a tour.
>>>
>>
>> music co's are still around and more evil than ever. their
>> toilet spoke's scum, the riaa are busy locking up gramma,
>> (this is no joke.) for stealing music. band's continue to
>> earn millions and receive nothing because of the slime.
>> there are some copywright changes that make it worse.
>> the consumer is taking it in the shorts and congress fucks
>> bands.
>> yeah, they're around. sadly.
>> you would think bands don't need them, but try to get your
>> product in a store. over 90% of music sales are store based,
>> even is they are electronic.
>> and despite the fact i have uploaded and downloaded
>> terrabytes of tunes, i still spend in excess of $300 per
>> month on music. so it's my fault piracy has given the music
>> industry record profits for 11 years running.
>> is all this clear?
>
>Bands need to get wise and realize they need neither the companies, the
>RIAA, nor the stores...they can direct sell their own stuff to the fans
>from any web host these days. They can even set up their own net radio
>stations and grab their own ad profits if they want...musicians really
>need to get a clue and start exploring the coop net-biz model...that's
>what the pron venders do, and look at that profit margin.
>
web radio may be dead shortly. the riaa is asking for fee
hikes that are retarded. evensatellite radio won't be able
to play, never mind college radio.
the majority of consumers by from stores. you have to change
them.
porn vendors are smart...musicians are.....
musicians. most need good business agents. most of them work
for recors co's.
we need the chinese model here to eradicate the cp's.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|