|
|
Posted by mmaker@my-deja.com on 06/26/07 12:35
On Jun 26, 12:12 am, "Richard Crowley" <rcrow...@xp7rt.net> wrote:
> As others have observed PAL has slightly more resolution,
> but lower framerate. My personal observation is that it is
> easier to "upsample" the frame size without visual artifacts
> than to "upsample" from PAL 25 FPS to NTSC 30 FPS (i.e.
> attempting to create whole frames from scratch, as it were.)
But Americans are used to fake frames created from film, whereas going
from NTSC to PAL you have to pick five frames to throw away each
second. Also, if you're shooting in a PAL country you may not want to
shoot NTSC if you're going to have to deal with flourescent lights and
other nasties that flicker at 50Hz or some multiple of it.
Ideally you'd probably shoot 24p or 25p and then convert that to both
PAL and NTSC.
Mark
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|