|
|
Posted by Zee on 07/01/07 01:53
On Jun 30, 8:21 pm, David Simpson <farook...@picknowl.com.au> wrote:
> On Sat, 30 Jun 2007 19:35:09 GMT, Sniper .308 <m...@my.desk> typed:
>
> >On Sat, 30 Jun 2007 08:07:36 -0700, bobandcarole
> ><bobandcarol...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> >>So you're a voyeur also?
>
> >If you are, seeing that fat sack of shit blobby nekkid will cure you
>
> I do not consider voyeurism to be something that needs to be cured.
> Bo0by would never take his clothes off in public so that is not a
> fear.
>
> Of course it is amazing that God got upset when Adam and Eve covered
> their nakedness but all of the Christian churches get upset by people
> trying to return to that pristine state. Isn't there something topsy
> turvy here? Rather like the USAians who protest loudly about the flash
> of a boob on national television and then happily go back to watching
> blood and gore from the latest blockbuster film. Some people have
> their values backwards.
> --
> Regards
> David
> fundamentalism (n.): fund = give cash to; amentalism = brainlessness
it is sly the way you said he got upset...when they covered
themselves....he was upset about them eating the wrong fruit...and
they responded by being ashamed and that is the reason they
covered....if a parent spanks a kid for getting caught vandalizing
other peoples property...and the kid responds by rubbing his ass where
it is red...the parent does not get upset about that behavior....jz
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|