|
|
Posted by Bratboy on 01/14/06 17:13
"Justin" <nospam@insightbb.com> wrote in message
news:slrndsiavs.5nr.nospam@debian.dns2go.com...
> Bratboy wrote on [Sat, 14 Jan 2006 09:26:13 -0700]:
>>
>> "unclejr" <watsona@kenyon.edu> wrote in message
>> news:1137255100.810158.157670@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
>>> Roy L. Fuchs wrote:
>>>> You are a hero of your toilet bowl, boy. That's about the extent of
>>>> it, you fucking UNamerican retard!
>>>
>>> YHBT. YHL. HAND.
>>>
>>> -Junior
>>>
>>
>> LOL, "hero" isnt a phrase I'd use. I will admit tho that to some extent I
>> suspect movie downloaders did have a hand in Studios deciding to release
>> DVD's at cheaper prices. The fact that many movies can be downloaded
>> makes
>> it so the studios ask less in the hopes ppl will buy a copy instead of
>> stealing em.
>
> DVDs are the same price when released as they were 5 years ago. Nobody
> was downloading movies then.
Not so sure on either of those points. Iseem to recall when DVD's first came
out they were higher priced ($25-$30 or more for anything) whereas now adays
not uncommon to find New Releases for $19 or less. As for DL movies thats
gone on for some time as well so not sure when movies started being DL by
ppl if you include movies ppl divx'd. Like I said its just my opinon,
everyone has one hehe, and truthfully it really doesnt matter to me. I wasnt
saying whether it was good or bad, I'll let each person decide for
themselves.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|