|
|
Posted by Justin on 01/14/06 17:21
Bratboy wrote on [Sat, 14 Jan 2006 10:13:09 -0700]:
>
> "Justin" <nospam@insightbb.com> wrote in message
> news:slrndsiavs.5nr.nospam@debian.dns2go.com...
>> Bratboy wrote on [Sat, 14 Jan 2006 09:26:13 -0700]:
>>>
>>> "unclejr" <watsona@kenyon.edu> wrote in message
>>> news:1137255100.810158.157670@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
>>>> Roy L. Fuchs wrote:
>>>>> You are a hero of your toilet bowl, boy. That's about the extent of
>>>>> it, you fucking UNamerican retard!
>>>>
>>>> YHBT. YHL. HAND.
>>>>
>>>> -Junior
>>>>
>>>
>>> LOL, "hero" isnt a phrase I'd use. I will admit tho that to some extent I
>>> suspect movie downloaders did have a hand in Studios deciding to release
>>> DVD's at cheaper prices. The fact that many movies can be downloaded
>>> makes
>>> it so the studios ask less in the hopes ppl will buy a copy instead of
>>> stealing em.
>>
>> DVDs are the same price when released as they were 5 years ago. Nobody
>> was downloading movies then.
>
> Not so sure on either of those points. Iseem to recall when DVD's first came
> out they were higher priced ($25-$30 or more for anything) whereas now adays
> not uncommon to find New Releases for $19 or less.
Not longer after DVDs first came out it was not uncommon to see the big new
release that week for $9.99 at CompUSA. Many were $19.99 or so not on sale.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|