|
|
Posted by Spurious Response on 07/14/07 00:33
On Fri, 13 Jul 2007 11:12:22 -0700, ninphan <sjburke73@hotmail.com>
wrote:
>On Jul 11, 2:10 am, "Telstar" <n...@none.net> wrote:
>> "ninphan" <sjburk...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>>
>> news:1183638397.943560.104110@g4g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
>>
>> > On Jul 4, 6:17 pm, "Telstar" <n...@none.net> wrote:
>> >> > That is irritating as I like BD, but the facts are HDDVD is more stable
>> >> > at this point in time.
>>
>> >> I agree with this conclusion.
>>
>> > Not surprising when you think Dolby Digital and 24-bit PCM are
>> > indistinguishable from each other.
>>
>> I know more about this than you could learn in the rest of your life. Do
>> you know anything about the psychophysiology of hearing? I do.
>>
>>
>>
>> - Hide quoted text -
>>
>> - Show quoted text -
>
>Wheeeee - why don't you go and play with your sacred TOS back at the
>HA forums then if you're so smart?
>You don't know more than I do about Dolby Digital, you might think you
>do, but you don't. A comment like that could only come from a smarmy
>cunt who's so full of himself that it takes every ounce of strength to
>get away from the mirror in the morning.
>Come back when your self esteem is not so hurt. In the meantime I'm
>sure you and Amir from Microsoft can keep listening to Blu-ray disc's
>PCM tracks with your $15,000 headphones saying to yourself over and
>over again "this is no better than Dolby Digital, this is no better
>than Dolby Digital, this is no better than Dolby Digital."
Use the beginning of Audio CD as a zero point for the timeline for
about when analog Dolby configurations came about for home consumers.
It all comes down to which of you were around back then, and which of
you were into electronics at that time as well.
Just being "some guy that likes stereos" won't cut it. In depth
knowledge is all that counts.
Describe the evolution of Dolby audio schemas... Now, now... no
google hunts allowed!
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|