|
|
Posted by Alpha on 01/15/06 09:29
"Roy L. Fuchs" <roylfuchs@urfargingicehole.org> wrote in message
news:3i4ks1tccas1akl7rtajtj9rl57alcpmkt@4ax.com...
> On Sun, 15 Jan 2006 01:09:38 -0800, "Alpha" <none@none.net> Gave us:
>
>>
>>"Alpha" <none@none.net> wrote in message
>>news:11sk3vp991bg084@corp.supernews.com...
>>>
>>> "Allan" <Spamsucks@finallykantica22admitstobebrianlamb.org> wrote in
>>> message news:p3vjs151o2v4gcihce6r9r9lovff83lqna@4ax.com...
>>>> On Sun, 15 Jan 2006 05:08:16 GMT, "Joshua Zyber"
>>>> <jzyber@mind-NOSPAM-spring.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>but it's another
>>>>>to be stubbornly ignorant.
>>>>
>>>> Count on 'Alpha' to "be stubbornly ignorant."
>>>>
>>>> Not so big on admitting when he was 100% wrong. Expect 'Alpha' to
>>>> completely ignore what he has said in the past.... especially when it
>>>> has been proven wrong.
>>>
>>>
>>> I will argue no further. I was and am not wrong on this. The problems
>>> they ran into are being covered up by political issues. That is all.
>>>
>>> There never was even the slightest indication of the merest prototype.
>>> Just hype from Samsung.
>>>
>>> As for Zyber, kiss my doctorate.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>PS
>>
>>Here is a quote from someone who knows something about the technical
>>issue:
>
> Yeah, right. Another "guess boy" like many in here.
>
>> some kind of dual laser optical pickup that can cope withthe very
>> different
>>layer depths and light wavelengths. - not impossible, but very complex,
>
> Not complex at all.
Absolutely wrong. Totally wrong. Completely wrong. Naively wrong.
Therefore I dismiss your other comments and thread additions.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|