|
Posted by Agent Smith on 07/21/07 18:58
Jason Lane <jason@jason.com> wrote in
news:lhl4a3160uk4g0vt89lb7jev6g7ospt759@4ax.com:
> Pirates of the Caribbean, especially the second and third movie. Way
> too long and overdone. Take Johnny Depp out of the movie and it has
> nothing.
>
> Police Academy is another series I don't get, and there were 7 of
> those movies. They were third-rate at best.
James Bond and National Lamb-Poon.
> On Sat, 21 Jul 2007 13:43:32 -0500, "Wull" <wmailey@sbcglobal.net>
> wrotd:
>
>>I would say "Pulp Fiction" and the Blue something with Isabella
>>Rossellini and that wild man Dennis Hopper.
>>
>>Wull
>>
>>"Michael O'Connor" <mpoconnor7@aol.com> wrote in message
>>news:1185039037.519270.170120@m3g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
>>>
>>>> Very, very, very few movies should have a sequel. But if it makes
>>>> money -
>>>> there's always talk of a sequel.
>>>
>>> I am not a huge fan of sequels, and I can think of many movies over
>>> the years (Animal House for one) which at the time I thought would
>>> become a franchise, but the filmmakers were wise enough to quit
>>> while they were ahead. I've often felt if Batman hadn't come along
>>> that Tim Burton may have wound up doing a sequel to Beetlejuice.
>>> And there were some movies where I felt that based on the film title
>>> the filmmakers were trying to start a film franchise (Remo Williams:
>>> The Adventure Begins is the one that first comes to mind) and the
>>> first movie never caught on with fans and they were unable to make a
>>> sequel.
>>>
>>
>
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|