|
|
Posted by zaryzary2003 on 07/21/07 20:47
On Jul 21, 1:07 pm, Walter Traprock <wetrapr...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> "explorer" <N...@ubidnis.com> wrote:
> > x-no-archive: yes
> > "Dave" <dap...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> >news:1184989032.256973.203670@i38g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
> > > Compared to any other ones you also dislike, what 1 or 2 (live action
> > > or animated)
> > > film franchises do you regard as the most overrated one/s and please
> > > say why, for each one mentioned.
>
> > All of them.
>
> > Very, very, very few movies should have a sequel. But if it makes money -
> > there's always talk of a sequel.
>
> I don't think Gene Autry or Abbott and Costello ever had a sequel!
With regards to Abbott and Costello, it's hard to make a sequel when
you basically remake the same movie again and again. Don't get me
wrong, I love those guys. But seriously, their movies are very similar
to one another.
Regarding sequels, I don't like or dislike them. I like good movies,
and if a movie happens to be a sequel to an earlier one, fine, but
it's not like I'm going to like it more or less based on that.
Likewise, I don't look down my nose on sequels. For one thing, making
up followup stories using the same characters as earlier ones goes
way, way back, well before films (and probably even writing) were ever
invented.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|