|
|
Posted by RobertJM on 07/23/07 21:06
"Mac" <see.mac@SPAMLESSvirgin.net> wrote in message
news:5gibgqF3h3insU1@mid.individual.net...
> RobertJM wrote:
>
>> "Michael O'Connor" <mpoconnor7@aol.com> wrote in message
>> news:1185039037.519270.170120@m3g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
>>>
>>>> Very, very, very few movies should have a sequel. But if it makes
>>>> money -
>>>> there's always talk of a sequel.
>>>
>>> I am not a huge fan of sequels, and I can think of many movies over
>>> the years (Animal House for one) which at the time I thought would
>>> become a franchise, but the filmmakers were wise enough to quit while
>>> they were ahead. I've often felt if Batman hadn't come along that
>>> Tim Burton may have wound up doing a sequel to Beetlejuice. And
>>> there were some movies where I felt that based on the film title the
>>> filmmakers were trying to start a film franchise (Remo Williams: The
>>> Adventure Begins is the one that first comes to mind) and the first
>>> movie never caught on with fans and they were unable to make a
>>> sequel.
>>>
>> Ah Remo : Unarmed and Dangerous (don't know if that was the UK/video
>> title), always expected that to become a TV series.
>
> They tried (with Roddy McDowall as Chuin), but it didn't work out.
> --
> --Mac
Must have missed that one, Roddy McDowall !? good grief.
--
RobertJM
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|