|
|
Posted by POD {ҿ} on 08/01/07 07:19
Archimedes' Lever <OneBigLever@InfiniteSeries.Org> once tried to test
me. I ate their liver with some fava beans and a nice chianti
> On Tue, 31 Jul 2007 07:36:27 GMT, "POD {ҿ}"
> <DONT.EVEN.TRY.IT@DEADSPAM.COM> wrote:
>
>>Spurious Response <SpuriousResponse@cleansignal.org> once tried to
>>test me. I ate their liver with some fava beans and a nice chianti
>>
>>>>2 gig ddr2-800 ram
>>>
>>> What? No ECC?
>>
>>That would only slow it down....
>
>
> You're an idiot for saying that. It runs at the same rate.
>
> The ECC part ONLY gets invoked if there is a checksum error in a read
> operation.
>
And it isn't monitoring for checksum errors? Sorry to burst your "pub
expert" bubble, but ECC has always been an overhead on a system, OK now
the memory is fast enough for it not to matter, but it's still an
overhead.
--
Thank you kindly
POD {ҿ}
.`..`..`..`..`..`..`.
Oh people, know that you have committed great sins.
If you ask me what proof I have for these words,
I say it is because I am the punishment of God.
If you had not committed great sins,
God would not have sent a punishment like me upon you.
.`..`..`..`..`..`..`.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|