|
|
Posted by Richard C. on 08/01/07 14:03
"AZ Nomad" <aznomad.2@PremoveOBthisOX.COM> wrote in message
news:slrnfb005v.ed9.aznomad.2@ip70-176-155-130.ph.ph.cox.net...
> On Tue, 31 Jul 2007 19:15:45 -0700, Richard C. <post-age@spamcop.net>
> wrote:
>
>
>>"AZ Nomad" <aznomad.2@PremoveOBthisOX.COM> wrote in message
>>news:slrnfat0as.hmc.aznomad.2@ip70-
>>>
>>> DVD was 6x the price of VHS with players 10x the price. I guess it'll
>>> never catch on.
>
>>================================
>>Actually, even at the start, DVDs were about 1/4 the price of VHS titles.
>
> Again, you're not making a valid comparison. "Rental" vhs prices
> are irrelevent.
=========================
There ARE no "rental" VHS.
The same tape was available to all at the same price.
Most hot new movies were $85 to $120.
Rental outlets use the same media as you and I.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|