|
|
Posted by ChairmanOfTheBored on 08/23/07 01:30
On Wed, 22 Aug 2007 00:09:03 -0700, "Telstar" <none@none.net> wrote:
>
>"ChairmanOfTheBored" <RUBored@crackasmile.org> wrote in message
>news:frdnc31fs5i4gcbj02aqccldbdhp2cosss@4ax.com...
>> On Tue, 21 Aug 2007 16:15:45 -0700, "Telstar" <none@none.net> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>"ChairmanOfTheBored" <RUBored@crackasmile.org> wrote in message
>>>news:e5fkc35k5o6vma1dh62f42a66g9c87i2gn@4ax.com...
>>>> On Mon, 20 Aug 2007 18:10:09 -0700, "Telstar" <none@none.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>"Telstar" <none@none.net> wrote in message
>>>>>news:faddiq$2h8$1@zinnia.noc.ucla.edu...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "Derek Janssen" <ejanss@nospam.comcast.net> wrote in message
>>>>>> news:BP6dnYTvIseipFfbnZ2dnUVZ_o3inZ2d@comcast.com...
>>>>>>> Telstar wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>All it would take to kill off HD-DVD is for Disney to release their
>>>>>>>>>>back catalog of Classic Animated movies and that would be all she
>>>>>>>>>>wrote
>>>>>>>>>>for HD-DVD.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Done, and...essentially done, in spirit:
>>>>>>>>>http://www.blu-ray.com/news/?id=407
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>(They had to rush "Sleeping Beauty" ahead of the IMAX reissues,
>>>>>>>>>partly
>>>>>>>>>for the Platinum cycle, and partly because of all those darn ads...)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> These arguements are way, way too simplistic. What child cares
>>>>>>>> about
>>>>>>>> Disney animations release in high def?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The child with the parent who wants to buy them?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Derek Janssen (and if you're the offspring of a home-theater nut, you
>>>>>>> have no CONCEPT of how much you luck out)
>>>>>>> ejanss@comcast.net
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This idea will not keep any HD format alive...you must realize that or
>>>>>> you
>>>>>> are brain dead.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>I fear very few understand that very, very many movies are being
>>>>>converted
>>>>>to low res. silicon-based media players by various means. Portablility
>>>>>and
>>>>>cost greatly exceeds general consumer interest in quality.
>>>>>
>>>> Only for total retards.
>>>
>>>They have lots more money than you do. Get used to be taken over by them.
>>>
>>
>> Sure, dipshit. You go on believing your own utter bullshit. You cannot
>> even construct a proper sentence.
>
>Both sentences are correct.
>
No, idiot. "Get used to being taken over by them." would be a proper
sentence.
"Get used to be taken over by them." which is as you wrote it, is
meaningless tripe, which is par for the course for a twit like you.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|