|
|
Posted by gaffo on 08/28/05 03:26
RichA wrote:
> On Sat, 27 Aug 2005 20:10:00 +0100, "Java Jive" <java@evij.com> wrote:
>
>
>>The colour balance of my current LCD is better than any CRT I've ever seen.
>>
>>The contrast ratio/dynamic ratio is a little less than some CRTs, but
>>neither technology has sufficient contrast ratio to show dark scenes, such
>>as the opening of "All The President's Men" or the starscapes in "Stephen
>>Hawking's Universe", followed by normal scenes *both* to best effect without
>>requiring intervening adjustment - with CRTs the problem is image noise
>
>>from the brightness level for normal scenes being too bright for dark
>
>>scenes, while with LCDs it's the brightness of the backlight.
>>
>>The title you chose demonstrates that you are being irrational - I suggest
>>you crawl back into your hole.
>
>
> Colour changes with viewing angle, crappy blacks, dead pixels, lack of
> visual "punch" and fixed resolution.
> -Rich
>
>
> "Bittorrents are REFUNDS for all the BAD movie products Hollywood
> never gave us refunds for in the past"
DLPs are better than LCD now.
thay have a black level near CRT and a sharpness near LCD.
- buy the next generation or the one after, (5-yrs?) I'm confident that
the black levels will equal CRTs.
I just bought a DLP front projection Optoma H31 (great pict). and a 32"
3:4 CRT w/HD tuner built in for regular viewing.
I would NEVER buy an LCD for a regualr TV. I would for something like a
pocket TV maybe.
only huge drawback is the fix-pixel area. But they use tricks which
helps in the scalling of some signal sources.
CRTs will always rule the roost in that one area.
CRTs remain a proven high quality technology. I only use a 22" CRT for
my PC also.
--
"Had we gone into Baghdad -- we could have done it,
you guys could have done it, you could have been there
in 48 hours -- and then what? Which sergeant, which
private, whose life would be at stake in perhaps a
fruitless hunt in an urban guerilla war to find the
most-secure dictator in the world? Whose life would
be on my hands as the commander-in-chief because I,
unilaterally, went beyond the international law, went
beyond the stated mission, and said we're going to show
our macho? We're going into Baghdad. We're going to be
an occupying power -- America in an Arab land
-- with no allies at our side. It would have been
disastrous."
-- G. Bush 2/28/1998
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|