| 
	
 | 
 Posted by Jyeshta on 08/30/07 14:26 
On Thu, 30 Aug 2007 01:17:08 +0100, "kim" <ntscuser@aol.com> 
wrote: 
 
>"Greg Farr" <gregfarr@comcast.net> wrote in message  
>news:6r0cd3da6cp0s0qanoi8gbu98a5b5ukclp@4ax.com... 
>> On Wed, 29 Aug 2007 13:56:26 +0100, "kim" <ntscuser@aol.com> wrote: 
>> 
>>>"Greg Farr" <gregfarr@comcast.net> wrote in message 
>>>news:f4i9d3lnpj4r6gq3958dkj874fpaomlgpm@4ax.com... 
>>>> On Tue, 28 Aug 2007 15:54:10 +0100, "kim" <ntscuser@aol.com> wrote: 
>>>> 
>>>>>"Greg Farr" <gregfarr@comcast.net> wrote in message 
>>>>>news:apl7d3lgkrf5u877e89kvajsc06lnn6b0f@4ax.com... 
>>>>>> On Mon, 27 Aug 2007 20:52:46 +0100, "kim" <ntscuser@aol.com> wrote: 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>"Greg Farr" <gregfarr@comcast.net> wrote in message 
>>>>>>>news:rec4d3t9r76vlhq6sh3f57mo98r09o1brj@4ax.com... 
>>>>>>>> On Fri, 24 Aug 2007 18:31:52 +0100, "kim" <ntscuser@aol.com> wrote: 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>"Greg Farr" <gregfarr@comcast.net> wrote in message 
>>>>>>>>>news:9ebtc3pud57bn2orbd9dsn0d2chqgnhj8v@4ax.com... 
>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 23 Aug 2007 23:55:27 GMT, "*alan*" 
>>>>>>>>>> <in_flagrante@hotmail.com> 
>>>>>>>>>> wrote: 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>"Greg Farr" <gregfarr@comcast.net> wrote in message 
>>>>>>>>>>>news:8n6oc3lnhheoquds5qp5uu1qvnbfukmj0c@4ax.com... 
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 21 Aug 2007 23:09:35 -0700, Greg Farr 
>>>>>>>>>>>> <gregfarr@comcast.net> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>I had a lead but misplaced it as I tend to forget things. I 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>remember 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>someone had a place with good fair hash numbers for movies, was 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>that 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>here or somewhere else? 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Never mind. I found it. 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Greg 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>Congratulations.  I'm happy for you.  It'd be nice if you shared  
>>>>>>>>>>>it. 
>>>>>>>>>>>Thanks. 
>>>>>>>>>>>--Alan 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> I'm sorry, it's just that I seem to be alone as a film fan around 
>>>>>>>>>> here; 
>>>>>>>>>> http://winmxworld.com/extras/mxcentral.winmxworld.com/index.html?contact.html 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>You're not the only film fan around here Greg but you may be the  
>>>>>>>>>only 
>>>>>>>>>one 
>>>>>>>>>who would consider using WinMX to download a film? I certainly 
>>>>>>>>>wouldn't. 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>(kim) 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Which one do you use, is it superior? 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>eMule, BitTorrent or Usenet, all have better resistance to file 
>>>>>>>corruption. 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>On a big file like a movie that's crucial. 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>(kim) 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Which is easiest? 
>>>>> 
>>>>>eMule (eDonkey2000) is most similar to WinMX and the best option for 
>>>>>finding 
>>>>>obscure video titles. It's also the slowest. 
>>>>> 
>>>>>> Are they equal in speed, I have broadband. 
>>>>> 
>>>>>Usenet is fastest. It will always download at maximum speed but is the 
>>>>>most 
>>>>>complicated to use. There is also a limit on how long a particular title 
>>>>>can 
>>>>>be stored on a newsserver. BitTorrent lies somewhere between the two in 
>>>>>terms of speed, availability and ease of use. Checkout the guides at 
>>>>>Slyck.com to compare the advantages and disadvantages of different file 
>>>>>sharing apps: http://www.slyck.com/guides.php 
>>>>> 
>>>>>> I don't 
>>>>>> get a lot of corrupt files, just found one tho, that stops playing 
>>>>>> half way thru  and I'd like to try & fix it by changing to mpeg or 
>>>>>> something. Do you know how to do a repair job. It's a rare film, 
>>>>>> otherwise, I'd just d/l it again. 
>>>>> 
>>>>>There are programs which can make corrupted avi files playable again but 
>>>>>I've never used one as picture quality is all important for me. 
>>>>> 
>>>>>(kim) 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Several yrs ago I used usenet & FTP to get programs, or something, & 
>>>> it was way complicated to use, for my mind, anyway. Is that what you 
>>>> mean my usenet, or just the movie sites on usenet? 
>>> 
>>>Usenet is what you're reading right now. You can download entire movies in 
>>>the same way as you download messages. 
>>> 
>>>> The film that 
>>>> started all this is Undercover w/ Kate Beckinsale, BTW. 
>>> 
>>>Do you mean "Underworld" or "Uncovered"? 
>>> 
>>>(kim) 
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Just what I said, uncovered, underworld sucks. 
> 
>With respect, you said "Undercover". I don't know of any Kate Beckinsale  
>movie of that name? Am just checking. 
> 
>> I know what usenet is and have used it since '99, but have seen any 
>> movies, I've got two that talk about them but no d/l. 
> 
>You need to have a newsserver which carries "binary" newsgroups such as  
>alt.binaries.movies. Good newsservers don't come cheap. You also need a  
>newsreader which can display and decode binary postings. Outlook Express  
>won't do it. 
> 
>(kim)  
 
Just to add, Greg could try using Grabit (which is relatively 
simple and free) to download the binaries and maybe Easynews or 
Giganews still offers a free one day trial or something. 
 
He'll also need something that unpacks rar files.
 
  
Navigation:
[Reply to this message] 
 |