|
|
Posted by Jyeshta on 10/26/07 20:10
On Fri, 26 Oct 2007 08:50:53 -0700, "Don M."
<newsreader@nospam4fineartsnospam.com> wrote:
Hi again, Don,
>Take a look at this article:
>"Directing Traffic: How was Comcast's traffic interference confirmed?"
>http://www1.pressdemocrat.com/article/20071020/NEWS/710200361
This one I had already read. The passage below didn't seem
applicable (yet) because while using uTorrent, my uplink
bandwidth was normal:
"Douglas would not specify what the company means by "access" --
Comcast subscribers can download BitTorrent files without
hindrance. Only uploads of complete files are blocked or delayed
by the company, as indicated by AP tests."
So I thought, I'll wait and see if this starts happening in my
area. Actually, they seem to be pretty lenient here for the time
being. I'd have expected them to re-throttle almost immediately
after I changed my ports in WinMX yesterday, but they haven't
yet.
>And then this::
>"Competition drives down Comcast profit"
>http://www1.pressdemocrat.com/article/20071026/NEWS/710260381
What do you think might result from this? If they'd provide as
much bandwidth as I want, I'd be willing to pay a little more
(even though it already costs a fortune), if I'm able to.
>I wonder if these are related...
>
>Don
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|